Jakob’s 9/11 Research

Bush blames Iraq’s instability on Hussein

<<Bush said Iraq’s instability “is the legacy of Saddam — a tyrant who exacerbated ethnic divisions to keep himself in power.”>>

This is a really funny example of history on its head:

Iraq as a nation is an artificial construction, engineered by the british around 1920, mostly upon what was previously Mesopotamia. The goal was Oil, which had just a few years earlier, during WW1 been identified as the most important geostrategic target. As the great Colonial masters the British were at that time, they knew exactly how to knit together a society, that was fit for colonial-style government, including giving power to one of the smaller ethnic groups; the Sunnis.

So when Saddam seized power, he inherited a british-made structure specifically designed for dictatorial ruling. That was what he then did. Bush’s administration must fully well know this historic background, so for Bush to whine about it is pathetic. Camon Bush, just pick up the leashes.
<<If troops were withdrawn now, Iraq would turn into a safe haven for terrorists, who could arm themselves with weapons of mass destruction and could attack moderate governments in the Middle East, he [Bush] said.>>

This is also really brilliant: There were no terrorists in Iraq prior to Bush’s invasion – at least not on any scale comparable to the current level. So now Bush has created a terrorist-nest, and thereby a nice excuse for his troops to continue the occupation. Also he reveals that the main reason for the prolonged occupation is AMERICAN SECURITY, not Iraqi security. That is by the way not quite true, but should be translated from “American Security” to Economic interests of Bush and Cohorts.

See the paralel to 911? Bush creates his own pretexts for his military aggression.

Here is a story, which in my opinion deserves a lot more attention than it seems to be getting. Apparently Bush proposes to paint a US aircraft in UN colors, and send it over Iraq, in a ‘false-flag’ operation, in order to provoke Iraq to shoot it down (or would they just blow it themselves?), in order to achieve a pretext for war. Can you see the paralel to 911? False-flag-operation = pretext for war.
BBC: Bush-Blair Iraq war memo revealed

I was a bit puzzled by the BBC piece here, because it was so abstract that it seemed deliberately trying not actually say anything.
What Bush and Blair Told the Press After Key 2003 Meeting on Iraq

Whereas This article gives a lot more beef.

By Greg Mitchell

Published: March 27, 2006 10:55 AM ET
NEW YORK A front-page New York Times article this morning about a meeting between President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair on Jan 31, 2003, is receiving substantial international attention. It gets even more interesting when contrasted with what the two men told the press when they emerged from the closed-door session.

(more…)