archiveWTC.jpg (JPEG Image, 805×832 pixels) – Scaled (83%)
This site has video footage that you can only get if you’re a serious filmmaker.
It would be nice to see their list of ‘clients’ – which camp are they in?
archiveWTC.jpg (JPEG Image, 805×832 pixels) – Scaled (83%)
This site has video footage that you can only get if you’re a serious filmmaker.
It would be nice to see their list of ‘clients’ – which camp are they in?
Så har Nynne igen brugt DR Deadline som platform for utilsløret propaganda imod Iran.
Denne gang har hun dog sikret sig selskab af en ekspert, der giver kraftig medvind til hendes propaganda, i modsætning til sidst, hvor en militær-mand sågar var lige ved at tage gassen ud af hendes propagande-ballon.
Nynne viser et klip hvor Irans præsident fastlår Irans ret til at have ATOM-KRAFT. Herefter går Nynne videre til at hævde at han lige har sagt at Iran vil have ATOM-VÅBEN…. !
Det var jo IKKE det manden sagde Nynne!
Nynnes medbragte ekspert kører videre ud af samme spor, og ingen af dem hæfter sig ved en sondring imellem civil og militær anvendelse af ATOMKRAFT.
Derefter ser vi hvad FN synes om sagen, repræsenteret ved JOHN BOLTON!
Hvor er FN’s general-sekretær lige blevet af???
John Bolton repræsenterer IKKE FN, han repræsenterer USA, og han er neokonservativ medunderskriver af nogle af PNAC’s mest kendte dokumenter hvori PNAC beskriver hvorledes de mener at USA skal kontrollere hele verden ved hjælp af kraftigt oprustet militær aggression.
Fedt nok – klart! Lad os høre hvad HAN mener om Iran, så er vi rigtignok blevet seriøst informeret i det intelektuelle parnas; Deadline.
Hvorfor ikke bare gøre Krarup og Langballe til faste studieværter, så ville der da være tonet rent flag… Spassere!!!
Jeg begynder at se et klart mønster: Hver gang Deadline skal have liret noget krigsopgejlende retorik af, så dukker Nynne-bynne op på skærmen.
Så snart jeg kan få downloadet dette afsnit af Deadline skal jeg lægge et udpluk her.
A member of the Project for the New American Century, Bolton was also one of the signers of the January 26, 1998 PNAC Letter sent to President Clinton urging him to remove Saddam Hussein from power using U.S. diplomatic, political and military power. The letter also stated “American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council.” [44]
A Spy Speaks Out – CBS News
The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy.”
Tyler Drumheller
911source.org | Dedicated to finding the truth
We are dedicated to providing you with the information you need to make informed decisions about what happened on September 11, 2001. Our goal is to archive as many 9/11-related articles, books, videos, and audio interviews as possible, to provide a forum for voicing a wide variety of opinions, and bring you the latest news related to 9/11.
This could be an interesting site to obtain material, if I were to try to compile some kind of presentation.
This site has lots of videos of speakers at various 911truth conferences.
911busters.com home page
Discover the Truth about the Events surrounding 9-11-01 via Video Presentations from some of the top Scholars, Researchers, and Analysts from the International Community.
This website has Most of the Presentations from the 1st International Citizen’s Inquiry into 9-11 held in San Francisco March 2004.
From their homepage:
1st International Citizen’s Inquiry into 9-11 held in San Francisco March 2004
DC Emergency Truth Convergence, July, 2005
9-11 Awareness Exercise 4th of July ‘05
Check out the media files from the Citizens’ Commission on 9/11
Misc. Audio / Video Evidence Exposing the 9-11 Cover Up
LA Citizens’ 9-11 Grand Jury, Oct. 2004
Chem Trails info
Nashville National Conference on vote fraud
Oklahoma City Murrah Building Bombing Evidence
other 9-11 related sites
Wargames Were Cover For the Operational Execution of 9/11
It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayed.
Full transcript March 11 2003
He represents over 400 of the victims of 9/11’s families and he has been given almost no attention
Video with Michael Meecher and Andreas Von Bülow; Two European high ranking politicians who speaks strongly against the official account of 911.
Norman Mineta – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Norman Mineta gave a fascinating testimony to the 911 commision, deeply incriminating Cheney. Subsequently Cheney’s accounts of the day have been changed, and Mineta’s testimony removed from the Final report, and video in the official archive of his testimony has been ‘invisibly’ censored; here’s a famous quote:
Mineta responds to an opening question by Commissioner Hamilton about the events in the PEOC and an alleged shoot down order. He describes a conversation between Cheney and a young man:
Mineta: �During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President�the plane is 50 miles out�the plane is 30 miles out�.and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president �do the orders still stand?� And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said �Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!??�
This statement raises lots of questions, the one that currently is of most interest to me is:
Mineta testified that he arrived at the PEOC at 9:20 a.m. and that Vice President Cheney was already present with his staff. “The 9/11 Commission Report” states that Cheney himself arrived at the PEOC at 9:58, a stunning 38 minute contradiction to Mineta�s testimony.
In the official commison report Cheney says that he did NOT know of the airplane heading for Pentagon before it had struck, which is clearly contradicted by Mineta’s testimony. Apparently because of Mineta’s testimony Cheney has then subsequently changed his own explanation, so that now he says he did NOT arrive at the PEOC until after Pentagon was struck.
Also there is the question: Was the order a ’shoot down’ or a “Stand down’? (more…)
I like this movie as a starter because it focuses strongly on the technically improbable aspects of the collapses, and it features several strong speakers. The first third of the movie is mostly clips from broadcast of the first day (before censoring), showing lots of dustcovered people telling about lots of explosions. The most of the rest is speakers enhanced with pertinent videoclips. The end seems to have been recently (April 06) appended with the Charlie Sheen Story.
9/11 Revisited – Were explosives used?
Video: YouTube – 9/11 Revisited (updated)
If you would like to watch video, this is a good one to start with.

(But maybe read Steven Jones first)
Squibs along southwest corner of WTC-7
Nails in the Coffin of Trade Seven
Close-ups from WTC-7 Collapse Footage Show
Unmistakable Signature of Demolition Charges

Photos And videos of the collapse of WTC7
YouTube – Loose Change 9/11 documentary part 1
“Loose Change 2nd Edition” is the follow-up to the most provocative 9-11 documentary on the market today. Not all factual but one of the best 9/11 videos out there. Best one that shows how a connection between 9/11 and the US government may have happened
Here you can watch “Loose Change 2nd Edition” Directly streaming.
(It is also available for download)
![]()
In My opinion this is the most ‘pop’ 911 video out there. That’s both good and bad. It’s could be good because being so poppy it will probably easily attract the gamebox crowd with its catchy music-track and high pace. It manages to spew A LOT of claims, which makes it very interesting, but also creates countless pathways for strawman attacks, as seen in the Popular mechanics attack: