Jakob’s 9/11 Research

Opinion:WTC Collapse:The Mjolnir Antithesis – 911 Wiki

A weaker upper structure(crash site and above), does not have the necessary strength to demolish lower floors (say for example floor 50), irrespective of its’ momentum since the lower floors are stronger than upper floors at some point in the collapse sequence. Classical physics reveals that every force requires a combination of opposing force and acceleration.F(1) = F(2) = m a m g

Here’s a highly speculative page that claims that the plane that hit the Pentagon was an A3 Skywarrior, and that pictures like the one below shows evidence of this.

FBIHidesA3

Secret military energy-source that can disintegrate materials…

I’m keeping this in mind when considering what energy-source pulverized everything but the steel, particularly the concrete floors, in the WTC towers.

The Truth Seeker – Horrifying US Secret Weaponry Unleashed in Baghdad

…Then to his amazement the tank suddenly let loose a blinding stream of what seemed like fire and lightning, engulfing a large passenger bus and three automobiles. Within seconds the bus had become semi-molten, sagging “like a wet rag” as he put it. He said the bus rapidly melted under this withering blast, shrinking until it was a twisted blob about the dimensions of a VW bug. As if that were not bizarre enough, al-Ghazali explicitly describes seeing numerous human bodies shriveled to the size of newborn babies…

Ed Haas is trying to establish a debate between defenders of the official account of 9/11, and a team of 911truthers.

So far he’s got a 7 member truth team, and on the official side one guy ‘Greening’ , while NIST categorically refuses to participate.

Muckraker Report

Nuclear Device used in Demolition of WTC:
Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11

Scotsman.com News – Sci-Tech – Glasgow tower block to shed light on 9/11 fire

A PROFESSOR of engineering is to destroy a Glasgow tower block in an effort to understand why the Twin Towers collapsed in the 9/11 attacks.Jose Torero, Professor of Fire Safety Engineering at Edinburgh University, will set the disused building in the east end of Glasgow alight and study the effects.

Well, as one commenter on this article pointed out: It will be intersting to see who sponsors this event.

9/11 Blogger – Blogging 9/11 Related Alternative News: Professor Jones: No Nukes at the WTC
Professor Jones: No Nukes at the WTC

I just want to pass on a couple findings from Professor Steve Jones, to clear up confusion.

Professor Jones has tentatively found that:

* The levels of radiation measured at and near the World Trade Centers are far below those which would indicate the use of nuclear weapons or mini-nukes

* The thermite/thermate used at the World Trade Centers likely included nanothermite or nanothermate, and not just conventional thermite/thermate. Dr. Jones tells me “Actually, the evidence suggests both forms were used! The molten metal seen flowing from WTC2 would be from the conventional form, for instance.”

* Real planes crashed into the Twin Towers. Specifically, Professor Jones stresses “This is not just my conclusion –– the Scholars for 9/11 Truth have examined the evidence and debated the issue, and the broad consensus of the Scholars from their internal debates is that real planes crashed into the Twin Towers.”

* The Scholars are split on what hit the Pentagon, and are demanding the release of all video tapes

You can read Dr. Jones’ work-in-progress here: http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/AnsQJones1.pdf

Or cached here at this blog: AnsQJones1.pdf

911Truth.org ::::: The 9/11 Truth Movement
Exclusive Report: Did Military Exercises Facilitate the 9/11 Pentagon Attack?

Articles

By Matthew Everett
July 2006

Which is this building?

Look at how it’s been carved out, and in contrast to WTC7 it has NOT collapsed.

I think this could be a supportive point to make when debating the WTC7 case.

Agenda911.dk – Think globally Act locally

11 September 2001 – New York – World Trade Center attack. The final rolls of film of photographer Bill Biggart found on his body. He was killed during the collapse of the north tower, the second to fall. He was 53 years old. *** DIGITAL IMAGE *** PHOTO CREDIT: Bill Biggart / SIPA PRESS

Data on WTC.

Pictures, Maps, 3D model

World Trade Center – Minoru Yamasaki – Great Buildings Online

Several different WTC destruction theories compared.
I didn’t even know that there were so many different theories!
The conclusion is that Steven E jone’s model is the only explanation that corresponds with reality.
Morgan Reynolds – No More Games • Net

Comparison of Destruction Theories
of WTC 1, 2, and 7

Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse? by Morgan Reynolds

“It didn’t seem real… There are thousands of these steel beams that just fell like pickup sticks.”~ John Albanese, volunteer firefighter and amateur photographer

“What struck us – guys like Warren Jennings and myself, who have spent basically all our lives in the scrap business – we’d never seen steel this heavy, this huge, this massive. It was just unbelievable.”

911 Truth Seekers-9/11 Blog
Comments regarding Prof. Jones’ “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?”

Here are letters from other scholars within the relevant technical fields of engineering.

This article shows the need for, and good precedence for giving scholastic support for Steven E. Jones, if you are so qualified.

G&G | Taking a Closer Look: Hard Science and the Collapse of the World Trade Center

While it may be difficult to awaken everyone from their state-induced fog of fear, we are at a critical point in history which requires us to try. We truly must take an objective look at the facts and evidence surrounding 9-11. While none of the many 9-11 researchers knows exactly what happened on that fateful day in September almost 3 years ago, any sensible person can easily spot dozens of inconsistencies in the official story that is being forced upon us.

An I particularly like this comment:

Mike of Oakland, CA writes: I don't have enough physics expertise to know if your analysis is valid or not. If it is valid, why hasn't any major univeristy's physics department endorsed it (even perhaps a university from another country)? Posted Apr 11, 2006  

911 Truth Seekers-9/11 Blog

Physicist (Dr. Steven Jones) says heat substance felled WTC

Steven E. Jones elaborates a bit about the molten steel. He says evidence is according(?) with the use of Sulphur enhanced Thermite, a type of explosive used in controlled demolition.