Some sites that focuses on researching the validity of the claims of who were the hijackers.

A bit esoteric, but might be exciting.
Awoken Research Group – 2006©
“Let’s discuss the 9/11 hijackers”
Some sites that focuses on researching the validity of the claims of who were the hijackers.

A bit esoteric, but might be exciting.
Awoken Research Group – 2006©
“Let’s discuss the 9/11 hijackers”
Alex Jones’ Infowars :: Because there is a war on for your mind

Alex Jones seems to be quite energetic, and very adamant about USA being a Police-state
Charlie Sheen appeared on infowars.
Alex is spewing Domaines like there’s no tomorrow, notably:
Moussaoui Says He Was Part of Plot to Attack White House – New York Times

TOTAL 911 INFO 
This new development is even more spectacular than the grade-school narrative put out by the 9/11 Whitewash Commission. It contradicts the Al-Qaeda plotline put out by the Whitewash Commission as well.
UPDATE: MSNBC reports Moussaoui was wearing a “stun belt” during his testimopny, with US marshals ready to zap him. Video tomorrowish.
If you’re looking for a reason why Zacarias Moussaoui suddenly testified today to a version of the 9/11 plotline that sounds more like the Official story than even the official Whitewash Commission report, this
video may have the answer.
Taking the stand before the jury that will determine whether he is put to death or spends the rest of his life in prison, Mr. Moussaoui related in calm, measured language that he was to have been accompanied on his death-dive into the White House by Richard C. Reid, the so-called shoe bomber, among others.
Jim Hoffman – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jim Hoffman is a name that appears quite often within the more credible circles of 911 webinfo. He gets a thumbs up.

Jim Hoffman is currently participating in the making of the upcoming movie Improbable Collapse
Wikipedia: (more…)
Steven E. Jones Is one of the strongest technical speakers on and analysts of the collapses.

He has written a paper “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?” which in my opinion is at the heart of the skepticism regarding the official 9/11 ‘explanations’. A MUST READ!!!
If you want to convinced by technical facts, that WTC was demolished; start here!
David Ray Griffin – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why the Official Account Cannot Be True
The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie

David Ray Griffin is clearly one of strongest members of the 911 truth movement.
He uses his training in logic to analyze the validity of the governments arguments.
He has written 2 books and made some videos – see below:
Truth Does Not Need Protection
Eric Hufschmid is one of the most controversial characters in the movement. He is toying with holocaust scepticism, and thereby creates a major strawman opportunity, drawing attention from both sides of the fence. Nevertheless – not having finished reading him – he seems to write really interestingly.


Eric certainly appears to be an extramely paranoid guy, as seen on this page:
But of course, as we know “Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you”
The Company We Keep
by Michael B. Green, Ph.D.
Version 1.2, February 15, 2006
(transload: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/company_files/holenorthend.jpg)
Michael has some thoughtfull reflections on how some of ‘loose canons’ makes themselves vulnerable to strawman attacks, and thereby endangers the credibility of the whole movement.
A good way to get a feel for the landscape of the movement.
Here he specifically attacks the movie ‘Loose Change’:
‘Loose Change’ An analysis, by Michael B. Green
Alex Jones Interviews Charlie Sheen
The interview that seemingly launched the whole “Government did it” discussion into mass-media.
An important event it would seem.
MIT Engineer Breaks Down WTC Controlled Demolition – Google Video
Jeff King goes into detail why the WTC Towers and WTC 7 were brought down by explosives.
Very strong and focused technical analysis of the collapses. As good as Steven Jones!