A very modest site, but it has essential links, and links to Official versions of events:
Archive for the ‘Dedicated sites’ Category
911TrueStory.com
Wednesday, March 29th, 2006Reopen 9/11
Wednesday, March 29th, 2006NY 9|11 TRUTH
Wednesday, March 29th, 2006
9-11 Review
Wednesday, March 29th, 2006
Haven’t looked much at this one yet – could be good, but I guess the picture sorta’ reveals where they’re going – not the technical route
9/11 Blogger
Wednesday, March 29th, 2006Physics911.ca
Tuesday, March 28th, 2006Main Page – Physics911
Physics911 is the internet component of Scientific Panel for the Investigation of Nine Eleven (S.P.I.N.E.). It features an archive of all photographic and video evidence found to date, a collection of archived articles, and original research articles by SPINE members and associates.

An example article:
WTC-7: The Improbable Collapse
by Scott Loughrey
High-profile, large-budget government agencies leasing office space in WTC-7 that day. Besides the SEC, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Department of Defense (DOD), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and New York’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM) were all tenants.
Improbable Collapse
Tuesday, March 28th, 2006An upcoming movie with:
David Ray Griffin, Steven E. Jones & Jim Hoffman
This is the ‘cream’ a Cream-team..
!

911 Truth Seekers
Tuesday, March 28th, 2006911 Truth Seekers-9/11 Blog 

Some say that there are Secret Societies, Powerful International Bankers and Satanic Cabal’s behind much of what our government does, including the events of September 11th.
Now that sure sets the tone… regardless they’ve released a videotape of Steven E. Jones Lecturing, so they can’t be all bad guys.
Also they have a good lineup of links to other sites.
9/11 Revisited – Were explosives used?
Tuesday, March 28th, 2006I like this movie as a starter because it focuses strongly on the technically improbable aspects of the collapses, and it features several strong speakers. The first third of the movie is mostly clips from broadcast of the first day (before censoring), showing lots of dustcovered people telling about lots of explosions. The most of the rest is speakers enhanced with pertinent videoclips. The end seems to have been recently (April 06) appended with the Charlie Sheen Story.
9/11 Revisited – Were explosives used?
Video: YouTube – 9/11 Revisited (updated)
If you would like to watch video, this is a good one to start with.

(But maybe read Steven Jones first)
9/11 WIDE OPEN
Monday, March 27th, 20069/11 911 Don’t wait for the truth! Get it now! Conspiracy corruption lies missile bomb demolition terrorist NORAD tragedy
9/11 WIDE OPEN
An open minded doorway into the 9/11 tragedy
A cute little ‘personal’ site, though a bit outdated.
He does have this article “Addressing the ‘Missile Pod’ and ‘Altered UA175′ theories” Which is in the category of strawman theory debunkifications. It basically supports the idea that was simply the ‘official’ jet that hit WTC2.
YouTube – Loose Change 9/11 documentary part 1
Monday, March 27th, 2006YouTube – Loose Change 9/11 documentary part 1
“Loose Change 2nd Edition” is the follow-up to the most provocative 9-11 documentary on the market today. Not all factual but one of the best 9/11 videos out there. Best one that shows how a connection between 9/11 and the US government may have happened
Here you can watch “Loose Change 2nd Edition” Directly streaming.
(It is also available for download)
- Loose_Change_2nd.E.911:Danish,Dutch,English,French 4 GB
- 911 – Loose Change 2nd Edition Incl. Extras DVDRip 898.1 MiB
![]()
In My opinion this is the most ‘pop’ 911 video out there. That’s both good and bad. It’s could be good because being so poppy it will probably easily attract the gamebox crowd with its catchy music-track and high pace. It manages to spew A LOT of claims, which makes it very interesting, but also creates countless pathways for strawman attacks, as seen in the Popular mechanics attack:
9-11 Research
Monday, March 27th, 2006911Truth.org
Monday, March 27th, 2006Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Monday, March 27th, 2006A Good Place to Start (Major site)
