Another example of the excercise of very academically explaining why and how the notion of a 9/11 inside-job is simply the result of some psychological problem.
The funny thing about this one is that it attempts to analyse how myths become popular, without ever questioning it’s own mythic platform.
Persistence of Myths Could Alter Public Policy Approach – washingtonpost.com
This phenomenon may help explain why large numbers of Americans incorrectly think that Saddam Hussein was directly involved in planning the Sept 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and that most of the Sept. 11 hijackers were Iraqi. While these beliefs likely arose because Bush administration officials have repeatedly tried to connect Iraq with Sept. 11, the experiments suggest that intelligence reports and other efforts to debunk this account may in fact help keep it alive.Similarly, many in the Arab world are convinced that the destruction of the World Trade Center on Sept. 11 was not the work of Arab terrorists but was a controlled demolition; that 4,000 Jews working there had been warned to stay home that day; and that the Pentagon was struck by a missile rather than a plane.